Robert Nozick embraces John Rawls’s critique to utilitarians (the usage of people as means) and applies it not only to them, but also to the theory of justice as fairness and to any other similar theories. Moreover, another criticism made by Nozick is that applying the rawlsian model of justice represents a violation of the freedom of those who posess more than one property, of the rich ones, and the restriction of their wishes to use their properties just the way they want to. By this, Nozick observes that Rawls acts like an utilitarian, even if Rawls’s main goal is, in fact, to offer an alternative to utilitarianism through his theory of distributive justice. John Rawls is adressed the same criticism that he advanced to the utilitarianists, that is the usage of certain people, in this case of those who posess more than they need, as means for the goals of those disadvantaged. But how can we decide the limits of what people can or can not make to each other? Both Rawls and Nozick reject utilitarian answers. The latter uses a strict deontology with a fundamental principle as: “Rights must not be violated!”, a principle that can be noticed even from the idea presented in the first paragraph of Anarchy, State and Utopia’s preface.